| 
 | ||||||||
|         In essence,
  the indigenous policy of the current government is assimilation: by means of
  welfare colonialism, its policy goal is to turn them into “the human beings.”         Although
  multiculturalism is enshrined in the Constitutional Amendment, the mainstream
  society tends to consider Indigenous Peoples objects for cultural
  consumption, and thus scorns their efforts at rights protection as futile.         Even if the Indigenous Fundamental Law (2005)
  stipulated that those law infringing indigenous rights ought to be revised or
  abolished and that relevant laws are passed within three years, nothing has
  come into existence.  Worst of
  all, the government has attempted to sabotage the Fundamental Law in the daft Indigenous
  Autonomy Bill.  Here are our
  charges: 1.
  Rights to self-determination: (1) Under the daft Indigenous Autonomy Bill, the
  indigenous governments are nothing but empty shells, devoid of any powers or
  land. (2) After the Typhoon Morakot floods, tribal peoples face forced eviction away
  from their homes. (3) Five indigenous towns are
  incorporated into the newly constituted metropolitans, and lost their rights
  to elect their own administrative heads. 2.
  Rights to property: (1) Traditional territories of
  the Indigenous Peoples are indiscriminately designated as the Public Reserved
  Lands. (2) Indigenous Peoples lost
  control of utilizing national resources on their lands. (3) The governments at all
  levels exploit indigenous lands without due consultations or permissions. 3.
  Rights to culture: (1) While indigenous languages
  are becoming extinct, the government has neither made all efforts at
  revitalization nor development.  (2) The Ministry of Education
  and the Council of Indigenous Peoples are passing the buck to each other on
  the lack of indigenous education demanded in the Indigenous Education Law. (3) The government has failed
  to pay due attention to indigenous higher education. 4.
  Rights to economy: (1) As tribal economy in
  persistent crisis, the Indigenous Peoples have no choice but to squat in
  urban areas.  (2) The average income of the
  Indigenous Peoples is much lower than the national average while that of the
  unemployment rate is much higher than the latter. (3) The affirmative action
  clause in the Indigenous Rights to Work has been largely neglected. 5.
  Social Rights: (1) Taking an Oriental
  perspective, the non-indigenous society tends to deem that the Indigenous
  Peoples are only fit for such activities singing and dancing or military
  service. (2) As government pork barrels
  are linked to patronage, the Indigenous Peoples have no free will during
  elections. 6.
  Rights to identity: (1) Indigenous Peoples are
  arbitrarily separated into Hills and Plains ones. (2) The government has deprived
  the Plains Indigenes their indigenous status, and thus perpetuated their
  traditional acrimony with those status ones. * Testified
  at the Joint Review Meeting for the ROC’s Initial Report under the ICCPR and
  the ICESCR.  Taipei, Howard Civil
  Service House, 2013/2/25. ** Professor, Department
  of Indigenous Development and Social Welfare, Former dean, College of
  Indigenous Studies, National Dong Hwa University;
  Inaugurating president, Taiwan Indigenous Studies Association. |